Wednesday, November 27, 2019

You gotta know Fat to be Pro-Fat

"Fat People" - Cover photo of book by author Bill Schubart
Fat used to be positive, now it refers to negativity, why? In the western Victorian ora, fat was associated with wealth. The fat men were well-fed because they had enough money for themselves and their family to eat and have extra as well. There was a more positive cultural relativity back then when considering the term ‘fat’. In the present time, characters in books and on television shows are asking questions like “Does this shirt make me look fat?” If they got a response of yes, does that mean they need to take the shirt off? Why is the term ‘fat’ so negative now? We need to get to the bottom of this new cultural construct because I do not like it and enough people are being excluded and dehumanized. This needs to end, so let’s bring awareness to this idea now.

What is so bad about being fat? Similar to the olden days, the word ‘fat’ is being used as an identity marker. Charlotte Cooper, author of “Fat Activism: A Radical Social Movement”, lingers around this topic of a broken society where we are unable to freely think and have perspectives. Society is manipulating and has people thinking societal ideals are dominant and most accurate to the truth; people think societal ideals are the truth. We are unable to listen to the voices of fat people as a collective and include them in society because it is already put into place that fat people do not belong. How we think socially is flawed. Our thought process is like … on autopilot or default because we use societal thoughts as our own. We have to learn how to first unlearn to be able to think for ourselves and think with a little more empathy for that matter. Societal perspectives are inhumane.

A person wouldn’t be presumed to be wealthy and happy within this society, more like the opposite. If someone is fat today, they are selfish and greedy. They don’t know how to share, which is why they are fat after all right? They aren’t happy, how can they be happy when they have diabetes or some health issue. We are all of a sudden health experts and therapists without even asking a single question. What do people think they are honestly doing to help by telling someone they are fat? I am sure they are aware of their own body. Fat people can’t be free to live their lives with everyone staring at them. Of Course that fat person doesn’t look comfortable, they aren’t comfortable in their skin as long as society stares and points. Society is bullying fat people if you ask me. The only one who genuinely understand and know what a fat person may want for themselves is them, people who can speak on behalf of fat people are those who were in their shoes; other fat people.

Who should talk for fat people? Charlotte Cooper, author of “Fat Activism: A Radical Social Movement”, lingers around this topic of ‘who can speak for who’. It was suggested within the book that one needs to have experience within an issue before they can speak about or on behalf of people in the situation (pg 33 and 99). In other words, you can not try to make suggestions or opinionated ideas about or in regards to fat people unless you are fat yourself and have experienced what it is like to live within a bigger and differently structured and abled body. Speaking on behalf of someone you are ignorant to does not liberate them. We don’t speak for fat people, we speak for what we think fat people feel. That is not fair and is not getting any closer to inclusion and equality.

Fat people should always be included, they are people! Society should recognize the diversity within each community. There are complex variations of body size and structure. Labeling can become very exclusive when all body types aren't considered. The “one size fits all” label on clothes becomes disabling to a person whose body structure is incompatible with the material. This brings into question why their size is not included in ‘all sizes’, suggesting the body is abnormal, unideal, unnatural and continues the idea of hierarchies and inequality. BMI scales have even been suggested to be outdated and exclusive of various body types. We can’t let claims about our body, claims about bodies that society is unfamiliar with, change our own thoughts, actions and well-being. We should examine if these products are as advertised before we consider our physical appearances to be the flaw within society.

There are even studies suggesting the “fat gene” that causes larger body structures is also a “happy gene”. Fat people are less likely to get depressed --about an 8% reduction--. People should look to fat people for coping mechanisms or hobbies because there are people with horrible mental disorders and health issues that wish they were just fat. Fat is just as normal as any other body type. People get called ‘fat’ simply because they have the most pounds of the friend group. The terms currently associated with the word ‘fat’ are socially constructed in order to continue hierarchies. A specific body type is not more ideal or important than any other and physicalities should not be used as an identity marker. Give everyone a chance to show who they are without biased stereotypical ideas. Fat shouldn't be used as an identity marker because the term changes according to the context it is being used in.

1 comment:

  1. I enjoyed reading this! I love how this writing started because it is something I feel strongly about. How come back in the past being fat was looked at as being wealthy but now skinny is the standard? This is a great way to start the piece and is something I always think about pertaining to this issue.

    ReplyDelete

Disability. You're Helping Too Much

Lamar Todd Professor Shaw WGSS 275 December 10, 2019 Blog #2: Disability. You’re Helping Too Much. On the CDC (center for dis...